7.6. LIMIT and OFFSET
LIMIT
and
OFFSET
allow you to retrieve just
a portion of the rows that are generated by the rest of the query:
SELECTselect_list
FROMtable_expression
[ ORDER BY ... ] [ LIMIT {number
| ALL } ] [ OFFSETnumber
]
If a limit count is given, no more than that many rows will be
returned (but possibly fewer, if the query itself yields fewer rows).
LIMIT ALL
is the same as omitting the
LIMIT
clause, as is
LIMIT
with a NULL argument.
OFFSET
says to skip that many rows before beginning to
return rows.
OFFSET 0
is the same as omitting the
OFFSET
clause, as is
OFFSET
with a NULL argument.
If both
OFFSET
and
LIMIT
appear, then
OFFSET
rows are
skipped before starting to count the
LIMIT
rows that
are returned.
When using
LIMIT
, it is important to use an
ORDER BY
clause that constrains the result rows into a
unique order. Otherwise you will get an unpredictable subset of
the query's rows. You might be asking for the tenth through
twentieth rows, but tenth through twentieth in what ordering? The
ordering is unknown, unless you specified
ORDER BY
.
The query optimizer takes
LIMIT
into account when
generating query plans, so you are very likely to get different
plans (yielding different row orders) depending on what you give
for
LIMIT
and
OFFSET
. Thus, using
different
LIMIT
/
OFFSET
values to select
different subsets of a query result
will give
inconsistent results
unless you enforce a predictable
result ordering with
ORDER BY
. This is not a bug; it
is an inherent consequence of the fact that SQL does not promise to
deliver the results of a query in any particular order unless
ORDER BY
is used to constrain the order.
The rows skipped by an
OFFSET
clause still have to be
computed inside the server; therefore a large
OFFSET
might be inefficient.