CREATE POLICY
CREATE POLICY
CREATE POLICY - define a new row level security policy for a table
Synopsis
CREATE POLICYnameONtable_name[ AS { PERMISSIVE | RESTRICTIVE } ] [ FOR { ALL | SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE } ] [ TO {role_name| PUBLIC | CURRENT_USER | SESSION_USER } [, ...] ] [ USING (using_expression) ] [ WITH CHECK (check_expression) ]
Description
The
CREATE POLICY
command defines a new row-level
security policy for a table. Note that row-level security must be
enabled on the table (using
ALTER TABLE ... ENABLE ROW LEVEL
SECURITY
) in order for created policies to be applied.
A policy grants the permission to select, insert, update, or delete rows
that match the relevant policy expression. Existing table rows are
checked against the expression specified in
USING
,
while new rows that would be created via
INSERT
or
UPDATE
are checked against the expression specified
in
WITH CHECK
. When a
USING
expression returns true for a given row then that row is visible to the
user, while if false or null is returned then the row is not visible.
When a
WITH CHECK
expression returns true for a row
then that row is inserted or updated, while if false or null is returned
then an error occurs.
For
INSERT
and
UPDATE
statements,
WITH CHECK
expressions are enforced after
BEFORE
triggers are fired, and before any actual data
modifications are made. Thus a
BEFORE ROW
trigger may
modify the data to be inserted, affecting the result of the security
policy check.
WITH CHECK
expressions are enforced
before any other constraints.
Policy names are per-table. Therefore, one policy name can be used for many different tables and have a definition for each table which is appropriate to that table.
Policies can be applied for specific commands or for specific roles. The default for newly created policies is that they apply for all commands and roles, unless otherwise specified. Multiple policies may apply to a single command; see below for more details. Table 240 summarizes how the different types of policy apply to specific commands.
For policies that can have both
USING
and
WITH CHECK
expressions (
ALL
and
UPDATE
), if no
WITH CHECK
expression is defined, then the
USING
expression will be
used both to determine which rows are visible (normal
USING
case) and which new rows will be allowed to be
added (
WITH CHECK
case).
If row-level security is enabled for a table, but no applicable policies exist, a " default deny " policy is assumed, so that no rows will be visible or updatable.
Parameters
-
name -
The name of the policy to be created. This must be distinct from the name of any other policy for the table.
-
table_name -
The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the table the policy applies to.
-
PERMISSIVE -
Specify that the policy is to be created as a permissive policy. All permissive policies which are applicable to a given query will be combined together using the Boolean " OR " operator. By creating permissive policies, administrators can add to the set of records which can be accessed. Policies are permissive by default.
-
RESTRICTIVE -
Specify that the policy is to be created as a restrictive policy. All restrictive policies which are applicable to a given query will be combined together using the Boolean " AND " operator. By creating restrictive policies, administrators can reduce the set of records which can be accessed as all restrictive policies must be passed for each record.
Note that there needs to be at least one permissive policy to grant access to records before restrictive policies can be usefully used to reduce that access. If only restrictive policies exist, then no records will be accessible. When a mix of permissive and restrictive policies are present, a record is only accessible if at least one of the permissive policies passes, in addition to all the restrictive policies.
-
command -
The command to which the policy applies. Valid options are
ALL,SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE, andDELETE.ALLis the default. See below for specifics regarding how these are applied. -
role_name -
The role(s) to which the policy is to be applied. The default is
PUBLIC, which will apply the policy to all roles. -
using_expression -
Any SQL conditional expression (returning
boolean). The conditional expression cannot contain any aggregate or window functions. This expression will be added to queries that refer to the table if row level security is enabled. Rows for which the expression returns true will be visible. Any rows for which the expression returns false or null will not be visible to the user (in aSELECT), and will not be available for modification (in anUPDATEorDELETE). Such rows are silently suppressed; no error is reported. -
check_expression -
Any SQL conditional expression (returning
boolean). The conditional expression cannot contain any aggregate or window functions. This expression will be used inINSERTandUPDATEqueries against the table if row level security is enabled. Only rows for which the expression evaluates to true will be allowed. An error will be thrown if the expression evaluates to false or null for any of the records inserted or any of the records that result from the update. Note that thecheck_expressionis evaluated against the proposed new contents of the row, not the original contents.
Per-Command Policies
-
ALL -
Using
ALLfor a policy means that it will apply to all commands, regardless of the type of command. If anALLpolicy exists and more specific policies exist, then both theALLpolicy and the more specific policy (or policies) will be applied. Additionally,ALLpolicies will be applied to both the selection side of a query and the modification side, using theUSINGexpression for both cases if only aUSINGexpression has been defined.As an example, if an
UPDATEis issued, then theALLpolicy will be applicable both to what theUPDATEwill be able to select as rows to be updated (applying theUSINGexpression), and to the resulting updated rows, to check if they are permitted to be added to the table (applying theWITH CHECKexpression, if defined, and theUSINGexpression otherwise). If anINSERTorUPDATEcommand attempts to add rows to the table that do not pass theALLpolicy'sWITH CHECKexpression, the entire command will be aborted. -
SELECT -
Using
SELECTfor a policy means that it will apply toSELECTqueries and wheneverSELECTpermissions are required on the relation the policy is defined for. The result is that only those records from the relation that pass theSELECTpolicy will be returned during aSELECTquery, and that queries that requireSELECTpermissions, such asUPDATE, will also only see those records that are allowed by theSELECTpolicy. ASELECTpolicy cannot have aWITH CHECKexpression, as it only applies in cases where records are being retrieved from the relation. -
INSERT -
Using
INSERTfor a policy means that it will apply toINSERTcommands. Rows being inserted that do not pass this policy will result in a policy violation error, and the entireINSERTcommand will be aborted. AnINSERTpolicy cannot have aUSINGexpression, as it only applies in cases where records are being added to the relation.Note that
INSERTwithON CONFLICT DO UPDATEchecksINSERTpolicies'WITH CHECKexpressions only for rows appended to the relation by theINSERTpath. -
UPDATE -
Using
UPDATEfor a policy means that it will apply toUPDATE,SELECT FOR UPDATEandSELECT FOR SHAREcommands, as well as auxiliaryON CONFLICT DO UPDATEclauses ofINSERTcommands. SinceUPDATEinvolves pulling an existing record and replacing it with a new modified record,UPDATEpolicies accept both aUSINGexpression and aWITH CHECKexpression. TheUSINGexpression determines which records theUPDATEcommand will see to operate against, while theWITH CHECKexpression defines which modified rows are allowed to be stored back into the relation.Any rows whose updated values do not pass the
WITH CHECKexpression will cause an error, and the entire command will be aborted. If only aUSINGclause is specified, then that clause will be used for bothUSINGandWITH CHECKcases.Typically an
UPDATEcommand also needs to read data from columns in the relation being updated (e.g., in aWHEREclause or aRETURNINGclause, or in an expression on the right hand side of theSETclause). In this case,SELECTrights are also required on the relation being updated, and the appropriateSELECTorALLpolicies will be applied in addition to theUPDATEpolicies. Thus the user must have access to the row(s) being updated through aSELECTorALLpolicy in addition to being granted permission to update the row(s) via anUPDATEorALLpolicy.When an
INSERTcommand has an auxiliaryON CONFLICT DO UPDATEclause, if theUPDATEpath is taken, the row to be updated is first checked against theUSINGexpressions of anyUPDATEpolicies, and then the new updated row is checked against theWITH CHECKexpressions. Note, however, that unlike a standaloneUPDATEcommand, if the existing row does not pass theUSINGexpressions, an error will be thrown (theUPDATEpath will never be silently avoided). -
DELETE -
Using
DELETEfor a policy means that it will apply toDELETEcommands. Only rows that pass this policy will be seen by aDELETEcommand. There can be rows that are visible through aSELECTthat are not available for deletion, if they do not pass theUSINGexpression for theDELETEpolicy.In most cases a
DELETEcommand also needs to read data from columns in the relation that it is deleting from (e.g., in aWHEREclause or aRETURNINGclause). In this case,SELECTrights are also required on the relation, and the appropriateSELECTorALLpolicies will be applied in addition to theDELETEpolicies. Thus the user must have access to the row(s) being deleted through aSELECTorALLpolicy in addition to being granted permission to delete the row(s) via aDELETEorALLpolicy.A
DELETEpolicy cannot have aWITH CHECKexpression, as it only applies in cases where records are being deleted from the relation, so that there is no new row to check.
Table 240. Policies Applied by Command Type
| Command |
SELECT/ALL policy
|
INSERT/ALL policy
|
UPDATE/ALL policy
|
DELETE/ALL policy
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USING expression
|
WITH CHECK expression
|
USING expression
|
WITH CHECK expression
|
USING expression
|
|
SELECT
|
Existing row | - | - | - | - |
SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE
|
Existing row | - | Existing row | - | - |
INSERT
|
- | New row | - | - | - |
INSERT ... RETURNING
|
New row [a] | New row | - | - | - |
UPDATE
|
Existing & new rows [a] | - | Existing row | New row | - |
DELETE
|
Existing row [a] | - | - | - | Existing row |
ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
|
Existing & new rows | - | Existing row | New row | - |
|
[a]
If read access is required to the existing or new row (for example,
a
|
|||||
Application of Multiple Policies
When multiple policies of different command types apply to the same command
(for example,
SELECT
and
UPDATE
policies applied to an
UPDATE
command), then the user
must have both types of permissions (for example, permission to select rows
from the relation as well as permission to update them). Thus the
expressions for one type of policy are combined with the expressions for
the other type of policy using the
AND
operator.
When multiple policies of the same command type apply to the same command,
then there must be at least one
PERMISSIVE
policy
granting access to the relation, and all of the
RESTRICTIVE
policies must pass. Thus all the
PERMISSIVE
policy expressions are combined using
OR
, all the
RESTRICTIVE
policy
expressions are combined using
AND
, and the results are
combined using
AND
. If there are no
PERMISSIVE
policies, then access is denied.
Note that, for the purposes of combining multiple policies,
ALL
policies are treated as having the same type as
whichever other type of policy is being applied.
For example, in an
UPDATE
command requiring both
SELECT
and
UPDATE
permissions, if
there are multiple applicable policies of each type, they will be combined
as follows:
expressionfrom RESTRICTIVE SELECT/ALL policy 1 ANDexpressionfrom RESTRICTIVE SELECT/ALL policy 2 AND ... AND (expressionfrom PERMISSIVE SELECT/ALL policy 1 ORexpressionfrom PERMISSIVE SELECT/ALL policy 2 OR ... ) ANDexpressionfrom RESTRICTIVE UPDATE/ALL policy 1 ANDexpressionfrom RESTRICTIVE UPDATE/ALL policy 2 AND ... AND (expressionfrom PERMISSIVE UPDATE/ALL policy 1 ORexpressionfrom PERMISSIVE UPDATE/ALL policy 2 OR ... )
Notes
You must be the owner of a table to create or change policies for it.
While policies will be applied for explicit queries against tables in the database, they are not applied when the system is performing internal referential integrity checks or validating constraints. This means there are indirect ways to determine that a given value exists. An example of this is attempting to insert a duplicate value into a column that is a primary key or has a unique constraint. If the insert fails then the user can infer that the value already exists. (This example assumes that the user is permitted by policy to insert records which they are not allowed to see.) Another example is where a user is allowed to insert into a table which references another, otherwise hidden table. Existence can be determined by the user inserting values into the referencing table, where success would indicate that the value exists in the referenced table. These issues can be addressed by carefully crafting policies to prevent users from being able to insert, delete, or update records at all which might possibly indicate a value they are not otherwise able to see, or by using generated values (e.g., surrogate keys) instead of keys with external meanings.
Generally, the system will enforce filter conditions imposed using
security policies prior to qualifications that appear in user queries,
in order to prevent inadvertent exposure of the protected data to
user-defined functions which might not be trustworthy. However,
functions and operators marked by the system (or the system
administrator) as
LEAKPROOF
may be evaluated before
policy expressions, as they are assumed to be trustworthy.
Since policy expressions are added to the user's query directly, they will be run with the rights of the user running the overall query. Therefore, users who are using a given policy must be able to access any tables or functions referenced in the expression or they will simply receive a permission denied error when attempting to query the table that has row-level security enabled. This does not change how views work, however. As with normal queries and views, permission checks and policies for the tables which are referenced by a view will use the view owner's rights and any policies which apply to the view owner.
Additional discussion and practical examples can be found in Section 5.7 .
Compatibility
CREATE POLICY
is a
PostgreSQL
extension.