15.4. Parallel Safety
The planner classifies operations involved in a query as either
. A parallel safe operation is one which
does not conflict with the use of parallel query. A parallel restricted
operation is one which cannot be performed in a parallel worker, but which
can be performed in the leader while parallel query is in use. Therefore,
parallel restricted operations can never occur below a
node, but can occur elsewhere in a plan which
contains such a node. A parallel unsafe operation is one which cannot
be performed while parallel query is in use, not even in the leader.
When a query contains anything which is parallel unsafe, parallel query
is completely disabled for that query.
The following operations are always parallel restricted:
Scans of common table expressions (CTEs).
Scans of temporary tables.
Scans of foreign tables, unless the foreign data wrapper has an
IsForeignScanParallelSafeAPI which indicates otherwise.
Plan nodes to which an
Plan nodes which reference a correlated
15.4.1. Parallel Labeling for Functions and Aggregates
The planner cannot automatically determine whether a user-defined
function or aggregate is parallel safe, parallel restricted, or parallel
unsafe, because this would require predicting every operation which the
function could possibly perform. In general, this is equivalent to the
Halting Problem and therefore impossible. Even for simple functions
where it could conceivably be done, we do not try, since this would be expensive
and error-prone. Instead, all user-defined functions are assumed to
be parallel unsafe unless otherwise marked. When using
, markings can be set by specifying
as appropriate. When using
option can be specified with
as the corresponding value.
Functions and aggregates must be marked
they write to the database, access sequences, change the transaction state
even temporarily (e.g., a PL/pgSQL function which establishes an
block to catch errors), or make persistent changes to
settings. Similarly, functions must be marked
if they access temporary tables, client connection state,
cursors, prepared statements, or miscellaneous backend-local state which
the system cannot synchronize across workers. For example,
are parallel restricted for
this last reason.
In general, if a function is labeled as being safe when it is restricted or
unsafe, or if it is labeled as being restricted when it is in fact unsafe,
it may throw errors or produce wrong answers when used in a parallel query.
C-language functions could in theory exhibit totally undefined behavior if
mislabeled, since there is no way for the system to protect itself against
arbitrary C code, but in most likely cases the result will be no worse than
for any other function. If in doubt, it is probably best to label functions
If a function executed within a parallel worker acquires locks which are
not held by the leader, for example by querying a table not referenced in
the query, those locks will be released at worker exit, not end of
transaction. If you write a function which does this, and this behavior
difference is important to you, mark such functions as
to ensure that they execute only in the leader.
Note that the query planner does not consider deferring the evaluation of
parallel-restricted functions or aggregates involved in the query in
order to obtain a superior plan. So, for example, if a
clause applied to a particular table is parallel restricted, the query
planner will not consider performing a scan of that table in the parallel
portion of a plan. In some cases, it would be
possible (and perhaps even efficient) to include the scan of that table in
the parallel portion of the query and defer the evaluation of the
clause so that it happens above the
node. However, the planner does not do this.